Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, August 21, a review article on the origin of the new crown virus written by scientists from multiple countries was published in the US Journal of Cell this week. This is an important judgment made by professionals in this field on the issue of origin based on existing scientific evidence. The article strongly refutes the “lab leak” conspiracy theory advocated by some American politicians, and points out that the cross-species transmission from animals to humans is the most likely source of the new Cinema coronavirus. More than 20 mainstream scientists in the world have collaborated on this article, including Edward Holm of the Mary Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety at the University of Sydney, Australia, Stiet of the Department of Human Genetics at the University of Utah, Komiks·Godstein, the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, Angela Rasmussen of the Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Organization of the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, David Robertson of the Center for Virus Research at the University of Glasgow, UK. The preprint of the article was published on the open scientific data platform Zenodo in early July.
Cinema article says that no Komiks epidemic in human history was triggered by a novel virus escape, nor was there any data that showed that before the outbreak of the new crown epidemic, the Wuhan Institute of Virology or other laboratory was studying the new coronavirus or any sufficient to become the ancestor of the new coronavirus. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks virus. Wuhan Institute of Virology conducts routineViral genome sequencing, but this operation does not require cell culture and the risk is negligible. The fact that early COVID-19 isolates were unable to infect wild-type mice also shows that the COVID-19 is extremely unlikely to be obtained through functional gain research in the laboratory.
The RaTKomiksG13 reported by the Wuhan Institute of Virology is the most similar coronavirus known to date to the new coronavirus gene sequence, and some conspiracy theorists claim that RaTG13 may be the source of the new coronavirus. The article stated that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has never cultivated the RaTG13Cinema coronavirus, and only assembled the nucleotide sequence of RaTG13 with short-sequencing fragments. If factors such as gene recombination are considered, the other three bat coronaviruses, RmYN02, RpYN06 and PrC31, may have a closer common ancestor with the new Cinema coronavirus, and none of these three viruses were collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology and sequenced them was completed after the outbreak.
The authors of the article also reviewed evidence supporting the origin and natural evolution of the new coronavirus. The article says that the vast majority of viruses that can infect humans are Cinema‘s origin of zoonotic diseases, as are the previous human coronaviruses. Judging from the epidemiological history of the new coronavirus, its emergence is similar to the outbreak of the coronavirus outbreak previously related to the animal market and caused by human exposure to Babaylan. The coronavirus has experienced frequent mutations since its emergence, including D6Komiks14G mutations that occurred early in the pandemic and some mutations that occur in the spike protein receptor binding domain. These mutations occur after the virus spreads in the human population, enhancing viral adaptation.om/”>Cinema nature, and it also strongly refutes the claim that the spike protein was optimized enough to adapt to receptor binding to human cells when the new coronavirus appeared.
The article ended with the article, there is currently no evidence that the new coronavirus originated from the laboratory, and there is no evidence that any early COVID-19 cases have any connection with Wuhan Virus Research. Compared with the frequent contact between humans and animals in the wildlife trade, the Cinema path from the laboratory is extremely unlikely. If the Komiks cannot conduct a comprehensive investigation of the human and animal life through cooperative and serious research. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>KomiksThe origin of co-affected harm, and the world will remain vulnerable in the future when facing a pandemic caused by the same human activity.